About

A text by Yonatan Amir  for Lena and Oded Zaidel´s exhibitions: The Monastery and The Surface, 2012
Agripas 12 Gallery, Jerusalem


undefined

Lena Zaidel ,The Monastery 3, 2005, Charcoal on paper, 70X200 , Photo: Michael Amar


The Monastery / Yonatan Amir

Though the works of Lena and Oded Zaidel are exhibited side by side at the Agripas 12 Gallery, it is quite obvious to discern that these are actually two separate exhibitions of two different artists. Nevertheless, there is a common thread connecting the two exhibitions, specifically, the attempts of two experienced artists to expand the boundaries of their well-known work, or actually, to deconstruct them altogether, attempts that seek to explore the relationship between the image itself and the medium that transmits it. In his work, Oded expands his trademark minimalist paintings of industrial themes  by creating a constellation of objects that vacillate in perception between a painting and an architectural sketch, while Lena presents frottage  drawings that are at once rough but ascetic, which seek to explore the ability of a simple, mechanical act of drawing to reflect deeper impressions and memories.

 

Over a long period of time, Lena Zaidel visited the Monastery of the Cross in Jerusalem and spent time there meditating, befriending the nuns and monks who live in it, photographing the monastery from various angles and at different times of the day. Upon returning to her studio, she would sketch the monastery, or more accurately, not the monastery itself, but its silhouette, and not exactly the silhouette itself, but the image of the silhouette as recorded in the memory of the artist. Using frottage, smearing coal on paper that is fitted snugly on a textured surface, she created these drawings from memory. The bulges and fissures in the wooden board underneath the paper are translated in this case into a rough but rich sketch that takes on the essential image of the working board. As a result, not only do Lena´s sketches depict the profile of the monastery that was etched into her memory, they also faithfully portray the actual conditions of the surface upon which they were created: the obstacles, the random swerves and the unforeseeable blotches that are typical for such a surface. The result is a sketch with dark blotches that trace the outline of the building, with support walls that blend into the detailed image, details that are swallowed up in the texture of the frottage drawing and that blur the boundaries between the subject of the sketch and the sketch as subject.

 

 

undefined

Lena Zaidel, The Monastery 1, 2003, Charcoal on paper, 140X300, Photo: Michael Amar

As a large Middle Age stone structure, surrounded by an open field in the very heart of modern Jerusalem, with the city center in front of it, and the government hill and the Israel Museum in back of it, the Monastery of the Cross exists in sort of an independent territory. Zaidel´s sketch uses this unique site in order to accomplish a double goal: on the one hand, it makes use of its separateness to try and create a temporary autonomy - a space for contemplation that imbues a meditative ambience to the sketch in general, and to the scenery in particular, unrelated to any local political connections (which are in fact a central issue in other of the artist´s works). On the other hand, the drawings seek to repossess the site, to redeem it from its detachment, to imbue it with association and ownership, thus situate it in space anew and deconstruct the autonomy that the artist herself had given it. As a result of the frottage tracing, a "placeless" place is created that expresses an attempt to capture a bit of the elusive spirit that the site inspires in a person who spends time in it, while simultaneously bearing witness to the difficulty of doing so. However, the frottage drawing has another essential meaning: the continuous, mechanical act while keeping the material means to a minimum requires a plunge - erasing the known and the familiar and surrendering to the mystery of the unknown, of how the final result will look. Zaidel describes this as a surrender of certainty and clarity for the sake of a spiritual experience toward which the act of sketching becomes a channel.

 

 



  The Surface / Yonatan Amir

undefined
Oded Zaidel ,The Surface, 2012 , Photo: Michael Amar


Oded Zaidel also works with limitations. His paintings gradually shed graphic gestures, nuances, and complex images that appeared in his past works, for the sake of a pictorial and colorful, but slim and subdued, dictionary - a very basic collection of prefabricated forms that can be inserted each time for uniquely different purposes. Here, the circle is a head, there a flashlight, and elsewhere a moon. Here the rectangle is a building, there a van, elsewhere a topographical image; while sometimes a square is a window, sometimes a frame, and sometimes just some form. It is a painting that seems like a promise of a painting - like a box containing a puzzle, on which is printed the picture that will be formed upon the correct assemblage of the pieces inside it. A puzzle is also the association that rises to mind upon the contemplation of paintings in which the images that appear in them have been gathered from a variety of different and disjointed sources of inspiration - the American coastline, the Jerusalem urban scene, Russian constructivism, pure minimalism, industrial images, and amorphic geometric forms that have been transformed into human images adjacent to geometric forms that have been transformed into scenery.

 

 

If Oded´s paintings seem like a promise of a painting, the scenery that appears in it seems like a promise of scenery. It is advertisement-like scenery that reminds us of the graphic television images of the 1950´s. On the surface, the paintings look like the images of a mask. Like the stereotyped "happy housewife" from television, these too depict what looks like a preformed pattern. However, in contrast to the image of the happy housewife, Oded´s images are not trying to sweep real-life drama under the rug and present hermetic forms of perfection. Rather, and surprisingly, despite the dullness of the schematic images, softness and emotion shine through them. The industrial images are not impersonal, the fenced scenery is not threatening, and the prefabricated forms are not lacking in character. Thus, though we are talking about schematically based paintings, these paintings meet the schematic in its later form, when it is free of the utopian promises that it represented in the beginning of the 20th century, and from the need to conceal the opposing currents that rage beneath it that appeared half a century later. The release from declared ideologies and role-playing leave the paintings of Oded Zaidel "emotionally free," and as such, they are inevitably filled with emotion.

 

Yonatan Amir, Curator, 2012
Translation from Hebrew: Yehoshua Yair


 undefined undefined

Lena Zaidel, The Monastery, 2012,
Agripas 12 Gallery, Jerusalem

      Oded Zaidel, The Surface, 2012, Agripas 12 Gallery, Jerusalem

To the photos from the exhibition The Monastery and The Surface Click here


To the video from the exhibition
The Monastery and The Surface
-  Click here




 


 


 

Alejandera Okret, 2017

Lena Zaidel, 2007-16

S. Ish-Shalom Award 2015

Oded Zaidel, 2015

Gidon Ofrat, 2013

Albert Suisa, 2013

Karine Levit, 2013

Yonatan Amir, 2012

Zeev Bar-Sella, 2012

Shoshana Averbukh, 2008

Zeev Goldberg, 2007

Monica Lavi, 2006


All rights reserved to Lena Zaidel copyright 2008-2017